| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.
Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.,〔__ F.3d __, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11802 (Fed. Cir. July 9, 2015) (Plager, J.).〕 is a July 2015 decision of the Federal Circuit affirming the final order of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), the recently created adjudicatory arm of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), invalidating as patent ineligible the claims in issue of Versata’s (U.S. Patent No. 6,553,350 )〔Method and apparatus for pricing products in multi-level product and organizational groups (issued Apr. 22, 2003).〕 (the '350 patent). This was the first case in the Federal Circuit reviewing a final order in a Covered Business Method (CBM) invalidation proceeding under the America Invents Act (AIA).〔Pub. L. No. 112-29, 125 Stat. 284 (2011).〕 The case set an important precedent by deciding several unsettled issues in the interpretation of the CBM provisions of the AIA>,〔Dennis Crouch, (''Versata v. SAP: Federal Circuit Claims Broad Review of CBM Decisions'' ), Patently-O (July 9, 2015) ("an important decision stemming from the first Covered Business Method (CBM) Review Proceeding").〕 including what are business-method patents under the AIA and whether the AIA authorizes the PTO to hold such patents invalid in CBM proceedings on the ground that they are patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as “abstract ideas.”
==Background==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|